Sentiment analysis reveals diverse SDG narratives in 100 countries, suggesting media framing impacts development outcomes.
Understanding how media narratives frame the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is essential for global sustainability governance. This study presents a novel, data-driven analysis of 135,000 news articles mapped to SDGs 1–17 across 100 countries. Using polarity-based sentiment aggregation and principal component analysis (PCA), we reduce high-dimensional SDG sentiment profiles into a two-dimensional space and identify emergent clusters of countries using K-means. To contextualize these clusters, we integrate national-level indicators like Human Development Index (HDI), GDP per capita, CO2 emissions, and press freedom scores, revealing robust correlations between sentiment structure and developmental attributes. Countries with higher HDI and freer media environments produce more optimistic and diverse SDG narratives, while lower-HDI countries tend toward more polarized or crisis-framed coverage. Our findings offer a typology of SDG discourse that reflects geopolitical, environmental, and informational asymmetries, providing new insights to support international policy coordination and sustainability communication. This work contributes a scalable methodology for monitoring global sustainability sentiment and underscores the importance of narrative equity in achieving Agenda 2030.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sufi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: