Background: Minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) offers benefits such as reduced surgical trauma and faster recovery. However, intraoperative hyperglycaemia during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is a concern due to its association with adverse outcomes. While glycemic control has been studied in conventional cardiac procedures, limited data exist on its impact in MICS. Objective: To assess whether intraoperative blood glucose levels influence early postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing MICS. Methodology: A retrospective observational study at a tertiary care hospital was conducted over 8.5 months. 40 patients undergoing elective MICS were divided into two groups based on intraoperative blood glucose levels: Group A (≤200 mg/dL, n=15) and Group B (≥201 mg/dL, n=25). Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected, including neurocognitive outcomes (Mini-Mental State Examination), duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU stay, and need for inotropic support. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v26.0 with p<0.05 considered significant. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable, except for higher creatinine clearance in the hyperglycaemic group. No significant differences were found in neurocognitive function or mechanical ventilation time between groups. However, a trend toward longer ICU stays was observed in Group B (p=0.082), and cooling temperatures during CPB were significantly higher in this group (p=0.046). One mortality occurred in the hyperglycaemic group. Conclusion: Although not all findings reached statistical significance, intraoperative hyperglycaemia in MICS was associated with increased ICU stay and cooling intervention requirements. These findings suggest a potential role for improved intraoperative glucose management to support better recovery and resource efficiency in MICS. Larger, prospective studies are recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sanaullah et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: