Prospective cohort study reveals weak correlations between KOOS-12 and GRCS in knee osteoarthritis patients, suggesting the need for multidimensional assessment.
Background: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is the most prevalent form of osteoarthritis, contributing significantly to disability among older adults. Patient-reported outcome measures such as the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-12 (KOOS-12) and global anchors like the Global Rating of Change Scale (GRCS) are widely employed to assess treatment response, but their alignment in physiotherapy-managed KOA remains uncertain. Objective: To evaluate the association between changes in KOOS-12 subscale scores (pain, function, quality of life) and GRCS ratings in patients with KOA undergoing physiotherapy. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted at Medicure Hospital, Lahore, including 60 patients aged 50–65 years with Kellgren–Lawrence grade II–III KOA. Participants completed KOOS-12 and GRCS questionnaires at baseline and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks of physiotherapy. Changes in KOOS-12 subscale scores were correlated with GRCS using Spearman’s rank correlation. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS version 23, with p < 0.05 considered significant. Results: The mean age was 58.4 ± 4.15 years, and mean BMI was 30.6 ± 5.16 kg/m². Females comprised 58.3% of participants. Correlations between KOOS-12 changes and GRCS were weak: pain (rho = 0.15, p = 0.252), function (rho = 0.12, p = 0.375), and quality of life (rho = 0.11, p = 0.395). Conclusion: KOOS-12 subscales demonstrated only weak associations with patient-perceived improvement on GRCS, suggesting that multidimensional outcome assessment is essential for evaluating physiotherapy response in KOA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Munir et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: