Analysis reveals core risk themes in food safety, suggesting improved regulatory measures and public participation in Shanghai.
This paper focuses on the challenges in food safety governance in megacities, taking Shanghai as the research object. Aiming at the pain points in food sampling inspections, it proposes a risk prediction and regulatory optimization scheme combining text mining and machine learning. First, the paper uses the LDA method to conduct in-depth mining on over 78,000 pieces of food sampling data across 34 categories in Shanghai, so as to identify core risk themes. Second, it applies SMOTE oversampling to the sampling data with an extremely low unqualified rate (0.5%). Finally, a machine learning prediction model for food safety risks is constructed, and predictions are made based on this model. The research findings are as follows: ① Food risks in Shanghai show significant characteristics in terms of time, category, and pollution causes. ② Supply chain links, regulatory intensity, and consumption scenarios are among the core influencing factors. ③ The traditional “full coverage” model is inefficient, and resources need to be tilted toward high-risk categories. ④ Public attention (e.g., the “You Order, We Inspect” initiative) can drive regulatory responses to improve the qualified rate. Based on these findings, this paper suggests that relevant authorities should ① classify three levels of risks for categories, increase inspection frequency for high-risk products in summer, adjust sampling intensity for different business entities, and establish a dynamic hierarchical regulatory mechanism; ② tackle source governance, reduce environmental pollution, upgrade process supervision, and strengthen whole-chain risk prevention and control; and ③ promote public participation, strengthen the enterprise responsibility system, and deepen the social co-governance pattern. This study effectively addresses the risk early warning problems in food safety supervision of megacities, providing a scientific basis and practical path for optimizing the allocation of regulatory resources and improving governance efficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: