Framework improves susceptibility modeling and generalization with a stacking ensemble and negative sample selection.
To address the negative sample selection bias and limited interpretability of traditional debris-flow event susceptibility models, this study proposes a framework that enhances generalization by integrating negative sample screening via a stacking ensemble model with an interpretable random forest. Using Wenchuan County, Sichuan Province, as the study area, 19 influencing factors were selected, encompassing topographic, geological, environmental, and anthropogenic variables. First, a stacking ensemble—comprising logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT), gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), and random forest (RF)—was employed as a preliminary classifier to identify very low-susceptibility areas as reliable negative samples, achieving a balanced 1:1 ratio of positive to negative instances. Subsequently, a stacking–random forest model (Stacking-RF) was trained for susceptibility zonation, and SHAP (Shapley additive explanations) was applied to quantify each factor’s contribution. The results show that: (1) the stacking ensemble achieved a test-set AUC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) of 0.9044, confirming its effectiveness in screening dependable negative samples; (2) the random forest model attained a test-set AUC of 0.9931, with very high-susceptibility zones—covering 15.86% of the study area—encompassing 92.3% of historical debris-flow events; (3) SHAP analysis identified the distance to a road and point-of-interest (POI) kernel density as the primary drivers of debris-flow susceptibility. The method quantified nonlinear impact thresholds, revealing significant susceptibility increases when road distance was less than 500 m or POI kernel density ranged between 50 and 200 units/km2; and (4) cross-regional validation in Qingchuan County demonstrated that the proposed model improved the capture rate for high/very high susceptibility areas by 48.86%, improving it from 4.55% to 53.41%, with a site density of 0.0469 events/km2 in very high-susceptibility zones. Overall, this framework offers a high-precision and interpretable debris-flow risk management tool, highlights the substantial influence of anthropogenic factors such as roads and land development, and introduces a “negative-sample screening with cross-regional generalization” strategy to support land-use planning and disaster prevention in mountainous regions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: