This optimization scheme enhances energy efficiency and queue stability in UAV-MEC networks, suggesting potential solutions for wireless challenges.
In complex urban wireless environments, unmanned aerial vehicle–mobile edge computing (UAV-MEC) systems face challenges like link blockage and single-antenna eavesdropping threats. The traditional single reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS), limited in collaboration, struggles to address these issues. This paper proposes a double-RIS cooperative UAV-MEC optimization scheme, leveraging their joint reflection to build multi-dimensional signal paths, boosting legitimate link gains while suppressing eavesdropping channels. It considers double-RIS phase shifts, ground user (GU) transmission power, UAV trajectories, resource allocation, and receiving beamforming, aiming to maximize secure energy efficiency (EE) while ensuring long-term stability of GU and UAV task queues. Given random task arrivals and high-dimensional variable coupling, a dynamic model integrating queue stability and secure transmission constraints is built using Lyapunov optimization, transforming long-term stochastic optimization into slot-by-slot deterministic decisions via the drift-plus-penalty method. To handle high-dimensional continuous spaces, an end-to-end proximal policy optimization (PPO) framework is designed for online learning of multi-dimensional resource allocation and direct acquisition of joint optimization strategies. Simulation results show that compared with benchmark schemes (e.g., single RIS, non-cooperative double RIS) and reinforcement learning algorithms (e.g., advantage actor–critic (A2C), deep deterministic policy gradient (DDPG), deep Q-network (DQN)), the proposed scheme achieves significant improvements in secure EE and queue stability, with faster convergence and better optimization effects, fully verifying its superiority and robustness in complex scenarios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: