Assessment reveals critical pavement risks in urban settings, supporting cyclist safety and sustainable mobility.
This study presents a smartphone-based dual-index framework for evaluating bicycle pavement conditions, aimed at supporting sustainable urban mobility and cyclist safety. Conventional assessment methods, such as the International Roughness Index (IRI), often overlook short-range discontinuities and are impractical for micromobility-scale infrastructure monitoring. To address these limitations, two perception-aligned indices were developed: the Bicycle Road Roughness Index (BRI), reflecting sustained surface discomfort, and the Faulting Impact Index (FII), quantifying acute vertical shocks. Both indices were calibrated through structured panel surveys involving 40 experienced cyclists and validated using high-frequency tri-axial acceleration data collected in both experimental and field settings. Regression analysis confirmed strong alignment between sensor signals and user perception (R2 = 0.74 for BRI; R2 = 0.76 for FII). A five-grade classification system was proposed, with critical FII thresholds at 87.3 m/s2 for “risky” and 119.4 m/s2 for “not rideable” conditions. Field validation across four diverse sites revealed over 380 hazard segments requiring attention, demonstrating the framework’s ability to identify localized risks that may be masked by traditional metrics. By leveraging off-the-shelf smartphones and open-source sensing tools, the proposed approach enables scalable, low-cost, and cyclist-centered diagnostics. The dual-index system not only enhances rideability evaluation but also supports targeted maintenance planning, real-time hazard detection, and broader efforts toward data-driven, sustainable micromobility management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: