This study demonstrates improved fracture analysis in geothermal reservoirs using deep learning techniques, highlighting better results in validation.
Evaluating geothermal reservoir potential often requires fracture analysis, as fractures serve as key pathways for fluid flow in subsurface formations. Borehole images (BHI) are essential for this analysis, providing 2D representations of boreholes with millimeter-scale resolution. However, their interpretation is highly subjective, leading to uncertainties in the results and the subsequent quantitative assessment of fracture networks. In the West Netherlands Basin (WNB), accurate fracture characterization is critical for assessing geothermal viability. However, traditional manual interpretation of borehole images has shown inconsistencies. This study introduces a supervised deep learning (DL) approach to support fracture analysis using high-resolution Formation Micro-Imager (FMI) data from the Naaldwijk well (NLW-GT-01). The proposed DL-based system integrates a U-Net model (PickNet) for segmentation and a fully connected convolutional network (FitNet) for automated feature extraction. Initially trained on synthetic low-resolution borehole images, the model has been adapted for FMI data using two approaches: (1) Transfer learning and (2) a simplified adaptation method that involves resizing the FMI input, leading to some resolution loss. A comparison of these approaches revealed that the simplified adaptation produced better results, closely aligning with conservative manual interpretations calibrated with core samples while enabling more detailed fracture detection. To enhance reliability, we propose a semi-automated human-machine collaboration framework, where experts validate or refine the automatically detected features. This approach leverages human expertise to improve interpretation accuracy while addressing challenges related to robustness and redundancy in the supervised learning model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Molossi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: