January 12, 2025International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Arts

Investigating the influence of coaches, trainers, and support staff on athletes' decisions to engage in doping practices

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

DPDilawar PathanUniversity of Sindh

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Mixed-methods analysis shows motivational climates and anti-doping education influence doping susceptibility in athletes, indicating the need for systemic change.

Key Points

Ego-oriented motivational climates significantly increase doping susceptibility among athletes, while autonomy-supportive climates decrease it.
Athletes supported by personnel with anti-doping education exhibit lower susceptibility, highlighting the importance of education.
Moral disengagement serves as a key moderator, with disengaged personnel leading to higher doping susceptibility regardless of motivational climate.
The study emphasizes educational and systemic reforms to reduce doping behaviors, suggesting targeted interventions for support personnel.

Cite This Study

Dilawar Pathan (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af495fad7bf08b1ead56d0 https://doi.org/10.47709/ijmdsa.v3i4.5302

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Mixed-methods analysis shows motivational climates and anti-doping education influence doping susceptibility in athletes, indicating the need for systemic change.

Investigating the influence of coaches, trainers, and support staff on athletes' decisions to engage in doping practices

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Investigating the influence of coaches, trainers, and support staff on athletes' decisions to engage in doping practices

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider