This editorial analyzes the clinical diagnostic value of 5 T MRI in knee injuries compared to 1.5 T and 3 T, suggesting potential advancements in imaging.
Journal of Magnetic Resonance ImagingEarly View EDITORIAL Editorial for "Clinical Diagnostic Value of 5 T MRI for Knee Injuries: A Comparison Study With 1.5 or 3 T" This article relates to: Clinical Diagnostic Value of 5 T MRI for Knee Injuries: A Comparison Study With 1.5 or 3 T Suwei Liu, Ming Ni, Dingyu Wang, Limin Feng, Yali Li, Chenyu Jiang, Shipei He, Yuxin Yang, Huishu Yuan, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging First Published online: August 20, 2025 Shimpei Kato, Corresponding Author Shimpei Kato [email protected] Department of Radiology, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Correspondence: Shimpei Kato ([email protected])Search for more papers by this authorHiroyuki Akai, Hiroyuki Akai orcid.org/0000-0002-6494-1091 Department of Radiology, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, JapanSearch for more papers by this author Shimpei Kato, Corresponding Author Shimpei Kato [email protected] Department of Radiology, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Correspondence: Shimpei Kato ([email protected])Search for more papers by this authorHiroyuki Akai, Hiroyuki Akai orcid.org/0000-0002-6494-1091 Department of Radiology, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, JapanSearch for more papers by this author First published: 20 August 2025 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.70051Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookxLinkedInRedditWechatBluesky No abstract is available for this article. References 1H. Alizai, G. Chang, and R. R. Regatte, "MR Imaging of the Musculoskeletal System Using Ultrahigh Field (7T) MR Imaging," PET Clinics 13 (2018): 551–565. 10.1016/j.cpet.2018.05.008 PubMed Google Scholar 2S. Pazahr, D. Nanz, and R. Sutter, "7 T Musculoskeletal MRI: Fundamentals and Clinical Implementation," Investigative Radiology 58 (2023): 88–98. 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000896 PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar 3Z. Wei, Q. Chen, S. Han, et al., "5T Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Radio Frequency Hardware and Initial Brain Imaging," Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery 13 (2023): 3222–3240. 10.21037/qims-22-945 PubMed Google Scholar 4S. Liu, M. Ni, D. Wang, et al., "Clinical Diagnostic Value of 5T MRI for Knee Injuries: A Comparison Study With 1.5T or 3T," Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (2025), https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.70045. 10.1002/jmri.70045 Google Scholar 5X. Li, J. Kim, M. Yang, et al., "Cartilage Compositional MRI—A Narrative Review of Technical Development and Clinical Applications Over the Past Three Decades," Skeletal Radiology 53 (2024): 1761–1781. 10.1007/s00256-024-04734-z PubMed Google Scholar 6S. Liu, L. Feng, Y. Li, M. Ni, C. Jiang, and H. Yuan, "Participant Discomfort During 5 T MRI Examinations and Its Contributing Factors," Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (2025), https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.29766. 10.1002/jmri.29766 Google Scholar 7Y. Zhang, C. Yang, L. Liang, et al., "Preliminary Experience of 5.0 T Higher Field Abdominal Diffusion-Weighted MRI: Agreement of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient With 3.0 T Imaging," Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 56 (2022): 1009–1017. 10.1002/jmri.28097 PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar 8Y. Guo, L. Lin, S. Zhao, et al., "Myocardial Fibrosis Assessment at 3-T Versus 5-T Myocardial Late Gadolinium Enhancement MRI: Early Results," Radiology 313 (2024): e233424. 10.1148/radiol.233424 PubMed Google Scholar 9Z. Shi, X. Zhao, S. Zhu, et al., "Time-Of-Flight Intracranial MRA at 3 T Versus 5 T Versus 7 T: Visualization of Distal Small Cerebral Arteries," Radiology 306 (2023): 207–217. 10.1148/radiol.220114 PubMed Google Scholar 10E. F. Jackson, "Quantitative Imaging: The Translation From Research Tool to Clinical Practice," Radiology 286 (2018): 499–501. 10.1148/radiol.2017172258 PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar Early ViewOnline Version of Record before inclusion in an issue ReferencesRelatedInformation
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kato et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: