This article develops a genre-sensitive conceptual model for understanding stylistic variation in translation, aiming to address the complex interplay between genre-specific norms and translational choices. Synthesizing insights from translational stylistics, systems theory, and discourse-oriented approaches, the study examines how multiple forces such as genre conventions, ideological constraints, audience expectations, and translator agency interact to shape the stylistic profile of translated texts. By conducting a comparative analysis across five major genres, namely poetry, fiction, drama, religious texts, and public discourse; it identifies recurrent patterns of stylistic vulnerability. These include phenomena such as metaphor loss, deictic flattening, tonal shifts, and narratorial dislocation, all of which challenge the preservation of nuanced stylistic effects during the translation process. In response to these challenges, the article proposes two heuristic tools designed to aid both analysis and practice: (1) a taxonomy of genre-based stylistic variation that maps typical stylistic pressures within each genre, and (2) a translator decision-making model grounded in norm-based and functionalist translation theories, which conceptualizes stylistic choices as contextually driven and often negotiated. Together, these frameworks reconceptualize style not as an aesthetic afterthought but as a core, contextually contingent dimension of meaning-making. By advancing an integrated theoretical approach to stylistic transformation, the study contributes both descriptive precision and pedagogical value to ongoing research, practice, and training in translation studies.
Ahmad et al. (Tue,) studied this question.