Case study examines trust in AI in submarine operations, suggesting broader sociotechnical perspectives are needed.
Engineering more trustworthy AI is increasingly important as AI is being applied to more high-consequence work. We argue that trust in AI is often examined too narrowly, and that there is value in applying more naturalistic methods to examine trust in the context of the entire sociotechnical system (i.e., people, technology, and work). We present a case study where we interviewed submariners, and describe how interactions among the people, technology, and work in submarine operations can affect trust in AI. We also discuss the practical benefits of trust as a social contract between end users and developers of AI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dorton et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: