Systematic review assesses various AI-assisted systems' efficacy for adenoma detection in colonoscopy, suggesting improved detection rates.
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to improve adenoma detection rates (ADRs) during colonoscopy, but the efficacy of various AI-assisted systems remains unclear. Objective: To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of different AI-assisted systems for detecting colorectal neoplasia during colonoscopy. Design: A systematic literature search of PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases was conducted up to March 4, 2025, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing AI-assisted colonoscopy to conventional colonoscopy. The analysis included AI systems such as GI-Genius (Medtronic), CAD-EYE (Fujifilm), Endoangel, Endoscreener, and EndoAID. The primary outcome was adenoma detection rate (ADR), analyzed using random effects models to calculate pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). SUCRA rankings and subgroup analyses were also performed. Results: Seventeen RCTs with 10,547 participants were included. EndoAngel showed the highest efficacy (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.50–2.30; SUCRA 0.9), followed by EndoAID (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.20–2.26; SUCRA 0.7). CAD-EYE and GI-Genius were similarly ranked (OR 1.46 and 1.45, respectively). Endoscreener was ranked just above the control group (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.20–1.56; SUCRA 0.4). Conclusion: AI-assisted colonoscopy systems showed improved ADR detection rates compared with traditional colonoscopy. These results suggest that artificial intelligence may help enhance detection during colonoscopy procedures; however, additional large-scale studies are needed to confirm these findings
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: