Analysis quantifies debris orbit estimation accuracy in LEO, highlighting the need for better detection systems.
Space debris is an increasingly severe problem in the space industry. According to projections, the number of satellites will increase from the current 10,000 to 100,000 by 2030, specially in LEO orbits. This significant rise in the number of satellites threatens space sustainability, forcing satellites to perform more maneuvers to avoid impacts or leading to the production of more and more space debris due to collisions (Kessler Syndrome). Consequently, substantial efforts have been made to detect and track space debris, leading to the development of the current catalogs. However, with existing technology, detecting and tracking small debris remains challenging. In order to improve the current system, several proposals of Space-Based Situational Awareness (SBSA) have been made. These proposals involve satellites equipped with telescopes to detect space debris and determine their orbits. Unlike prior works, focused primarily on detection rates, this research aims to quantify their accuracy in orbit determination as a function of observation duration, the number of observers, and sensor precision. The Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF) is employed as the core estimation algorithm, leveraging both simulated single-case analyses and Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate system performance under various configurations and uncertainties. The results indicate that a constellation of at least three observers with high-precision instruments and sub-kilometer positioning accuracy can reliably estimate debris orbits within an observation period of 4–7 min, with the mean error in position and velocity obtained being 2.2–3 km and 3–4 m/s, respectively. These findings offer critical insights for designing future SBSA constellations and optimizing their operational parameters to address the growing challenge of orbital debris.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Porras-Hermoso et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: