Numerical solution reveals peak water head errors under 5% in pipeline systems, suggesting optimal valve positions.
To gain deeper insights into the influence of pipe parameters on water hammer properties and achieve the accurate simulation of the hydraulic transient process in pipeline systems, the Finite Volume Method (FVM) is adopted. The solution scheme, incorporating a second-order MUSCL-type reconstruction, is derived, and the numerical solution process is detailed. For enhanced accuracy, the unsteady friction term is included in the numerical solution of the governing water hammer equations. The method is validated through a comparison with experimental data and the verification of mesh and Courant number independence, confirming both its efficiency and accuracy. The calculation error of the peak water head is less than 5%. Finally, an engineering case is studied to investigate valve arrangement and operation. Optimization yields the optimal valve position and operating parameters. This analysis provides valuable reference for pipeline system design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: