This analysis investigates corporate bankruptcy mechanisms during the COVID-19 crisis, implying distinct financial behaviors compared to previous crises.
One primary objective of the early warning system literature is to construct more accurate financial vulnerability prediction models and investigate the mechanisms and key factors that differentiate healthy from vulnerable financial states. Despite the importance of identifying and predicting financial vulnerabilities, existing research does not fully explain whether—and how—the financial behavior associated with corporate bankruptcy differs across crises. This study investigates (1) whether the financial mechanisms of corporate bankruptcy differ across three crises—the Global Financial Crisis, the European debt crisis, and the COVID-19 crisis; (2) whether these crises differ from tranquil periods before the Global Financial Crisis and after the European debt crisis; and (3) how these differences manifest. To conduct this analysis, we introduce a unique framework based on a random forest model, utilizing a corporate bankruptcy dataset spanning 2002–2023. The results show that the bankruptcy mechanisms during the Global Financial Crisis and the European debt crisis are not significantly different, whereas the COVID-19 crisis exhibits distinct characteristics. Additionally, we find that “Credit period days,” “Collection period days,” “Gross margin,” and “Solvency ratio (asset-based)” are key financial factors distinguishing these events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tanaka et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: