Analysis identifies a 22-parameter broadcast ephemeris improves accuracy in low Earth orbit systems, indicating advances in navigation services.
The integration of low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite constellations into the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) has emerged as a prominent research focus, as LEO satellites can significantly enhance the precision of GNSS positioning, navigation, and timing (PNT) services. In the design of LEO navigation constellations, the development of an efficient broadcast ephemeris model is critical for delivering high-accuracy navigation solutions. This study extends the conventional 16-parameter Keplerian broadcast ephemeris model by proposing enhanced 18-, 20-, 22-, and 24-parameter models, ensuring compatibility with existing GNSS ephemeris standards. The performance of these models was evaluated using precise science orbit from five satellites at varying altitudes, ranging from 320 km to 1336 km. By analyzing fitting errors, Signal-in-Space Range Error (SISRE), and Message Size Bits (MSB) across different fitting arc durations and parameter counts, the optimal model configuration was identified. The results demonstrate that the 22-parameter model, which was constructed by augmenting the standard 16-parameter ephemeris with (a˙, n˙, Crs3, Crc3, Crs1, Crc1) delivers the best balance of accuracy and efficiency. With a fitting arc length of 20 min, the SISRE for the GRACE-A (320 km), GRACE-C (475 km), Sentinel-2A (786 km), HY-2A (966 km), and Sentinel-6A (1336 km) satellites were measured at 8.88 cm, 6.21 cm, 2.87 cm, 2.11 cm, and 0.75 cm, respectively. Meanwhile, the corresponding MSB remained compact at 501, 490, 491, 487, and 476 bits. These findings confirm that the proposed 22-parameter broadcast ephemeris model meets the stringent accuracy requirements for next-generation LEO-augmented GNSSs, paving the way for enhanced global navigation services.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: