Proposed system shows GHG reduction of 1,300 tonne CO2 eq daily in wastewater solids, suggesting viable resource recovery opportunities.
Wastewater solids management is a key contributor to the operational cost and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of water resource recovery facilities (WRRFs). This study proposes a ‘waste-to-energy’ strategy using a hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL)-based system to displace conventional energy- and emission-intensive practices. The proposed system directs HTL-produced biocrude to oil refineries and recovers regionally tailored nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers. In an independent facility analysis, 576 WRRFs in the contiguous U.S. (CONUS) could deploy financially viable HTL-based wastewater solids management, simultaneously achieving cost savings of 4.81M [4.04M to 5.51M] $·day−1 and a GHG reduction of 1,300 [351 to 2,140] tonne CO2 eq·day−1 while offsetting ~1 to 2% of synthetic fertilizers. Key sustainability drivers include the biochemical composition of solids and internal rate of return (IRR), though IRR becomes less impactful at larger WRRFs. In a hub analysis, shared processing of wastewater solids at HTL-based treatment centers expands financially driven decarbonization opportunities to WRRF networks with solids mass flow rates higher than 5 to 7 tonne·day−1 and average transportation distances less than 80 to 155 km. Overall, this study highlights the potential of HTL-based systems for financially viable wastewater solids management while reducing GHG emissions and achieving targeted resource recovery in the CONUS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Feng et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: