Analysis reveals that board co-option weakens CSR performance in U.S. firms, suggesting a crucial role for independent directors.
This study examines the relationship between board co-option and corporate social responsibility (CSR) among U.S. firms. The results indicate that higher levels of board co-option are linked to weaker CSR performance, particularly in terms of environmental initiatives and diversity-related social programs. The negative association between board co-option and CSR is more pronounced in firms in which CEOs hold substantial power and short-term managerial compensation is prioritized and in industries characterized by higher information asymmetries. In contrast, independent, non-co-opted directors appointed before the incumbent CEO enhance engagement in CSR, highlighting their important role in fostering socially responsible corporate behavior.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Afzali et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: