Perspective review discusses improving representation in clinical trials through diverse enrollment strategies and real-world data.
Inclusive and diverse enrollment in clinical trials promotes trust in clinical research and its findings by improving generalizability and fostering health and healthcare equities. Diverse participation also facilitates the detection of potential differences in treatment response across subgroups, thereby enhancing precision medicine efforts. Yet, cancer patients who participate in clinical trials are more likely to be Caucasian, younger, and healthier compared to their representation in the broader cancer population. Given emerging health authority guidance and other related initiatives calling for more representative trials, there is an urgent need to develop and implement strategies to improve enrollment of a study population that reflects the intended use population. Real-world data/evidence (RWD/E) can help set trial enrollment targets and strategy, identify drivers and barriers in recruiting diverse populations, and provide supplemental evidence on under-represented populations, thus improving external validity of clinical trial results. In this perspective review, we outline a diversity dimension framework that includes demographic, clinical, treatment environment and other elements, and discuss opportunities and challenges with which RWD/E could enhance clinical trial representativeness and diversity. Specifically, we discuss the diversity dimensions relevant to oncology clinical development and various approaches in utilizing RWD to improve diversity across stages of clinical development, with use cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: