This paper explores how ChatGPT-4.0 addresses gender inclusivity through a comparative analysis of English and Filipino text generation. Three types of prompts (neutral, biased, and explicitly gender-inclusive) were used to test whether AI-generated educational content reinforces or challenges gender stereotypes in depictions of teaching professionals. Findings show that while ChatGPT-4.0 reliably uses gender-neutral pronouns (e.g., “they/them” in English, “sila” and “siya” in Filipino), subtle stereotypes remain in culturally shaped descriptors, particularly those portraying female teachers as nurturing and caregiving. This reveals a gap between surface-level neutrality and deeper inclusivity, suggesting that true gender inclusiveness requires more than grammatical precision; it demands critical attention to cultural assumptions embedded in language. The paper highlights practical implications for educators, noting that meaningful inclusivity in AI-generated content can be achieved only through culturally sensitive prompting and ongoing evaluation to ensure fair representation of all genders in educational contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kristine P. Guinsisana (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: