Case report highlights low vision rehabilitation interventions for a family affected by Peters' anomaly, suggesting tailored solutions.
This report aims to discuss a case involving family members diagnosed with Peters' anomaly, detailing the clinical characteristics, vision assessment, and rehabilitation. A family comprises two daughters and a son, were diagnosed with Peters' anomaly. Assessment included: visual and reading acuity, visual field, contrast sensitivity, and color vision. Different devices were employed based on each individual's visual needs and capabilities. The first daughter exhibited a visual acuity of 6/75 at distance and 6/95 at near in the better eye, along with a restricted visual field, moderate contrast sensitivity, and normal color vision. The second daughter had 6/60 visual acuity in both eyes, a restricted visual field, moderate contrast sensitivity, and abnormal color vision. Both girls were given a +12.00D binocular spectacle for near, and a telescope for distance, additionally, they were recommended to utilize a typoscope, felt pen, and reading stand for near tasks. The son had 6/75 vision at distance and near in both eyes, a restricted visual field, significantly reduced contrast sensitivity, and normal color vision. The son does not attend school; instead, he has been instructed in the use of a mobile phone application designed to magnify small print, and an 8x monocular telescope for distant viewing. He was also referred to a local organization that provides vocational training for young with disabilities. The father had 6/600 at distance and near in both eyes, a restricted visual field, severely reduced contrast sensitivity, and abnormal color vision. He received a video magnifier and advised to utilize bright illumination during reading and to use a cane while walking. The overwhelmed mother was referred to a counselling group for emotional support. In low vision-rehabilitation, various interventions may be recommended to patients with the same condition based on their age, visual function, and targeted goals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ithar M. Beshtawi (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: