Cohort development and data collection revealed key findings on health services in autistic adults, suggesting effective methods for diverse samples.
Adult autism services research is plagued by methodological challenges, including 1) lack of accessible self-reported outcome measures, 2) difficulty obtaining representative or heterogeneous samples, and 3) a frequent mismatch between experimental methodologies and real-world settings. The AASPIRE Outcomes Project uses a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach to 1) create a set of self- and caregiver-reported outcome measures to evaluate health and social services for autistic adults, and 2) explore factors predicting changes in outcomes. We previously used a CBPR-nested Delphi process to identify high-priority outcomes and then adapted or created instruments to measure them. We are conducting a longitudinal survey to validate these measures in a pragmatic sample of autistic adults from two healthcare systems, two disability service systems, and the larger autistic community in the United States. We collected baseline data from 870 participants. Follow-up rates were >80% for the 2nd and 3rd timepoints. The sample includes strong heterogeneity. As expected, sample characteristics differed markedly between the 3 subcohorts. All 22 outcome measures demonstrated excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Lessons from our experience may help other researchers devise strategies to effectively recruit and collect rich data from heterogeneous samples of autistic adults across various settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nicolaidis et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: