This analysis reveals the dual role of self-stable and coupled paths in stabilizing internal voltage and frequency in converter systems.
The oscillations induced by voltage source converters (VSCs) in DC voltage timescale dynamics pose significant challenges to the safe and stable operation of VSC-dominated power systems. However, previous studies have conducted simplified analyses without fully understanding the fundamental roles of different timescale control loops in converter-interfaced systems. In light of this, this study first identifies the key state variables and operating points that directly characterize the energy storage levels of devices and networks in AC systems. A model for the converter-interfaced system is then established in the specified DC voltage timescale. The key contribution of this work is the proposal of an analytical framework that decomposes system stability into self-stabilizing (Self-stable) and externally coupled stabilizing (En-stable) paths based on internal voltage amplitude and frequency, aiming to reveal the physical mechanisms behind internal voltage amplitude and frequency oscillations in DC voltage timescale dynamics. Based on this framework, the Self-stable path and En-stable path of the internal voltage amplitude/frequency of converter-interfaced systems are derived. This novel analytical method mathematically decouples the stability of a single variable into a direct self-influence path and an indirect path coupled through other system variables. Subsequently, the causes of internal voltage amplitude/frequency oscillations in the specified voltage timescale are explained using the Self-stability and En-stability analysis method. A key finding of this study is that the stability of the internal voltage amplitude and frequency exhibits a dual relationship: for amplitude stability, the Self-stable path is stabilizing, whereas the coupled path is destabilizing; for frequency stability, the roles are reversed. Finally, the results are verified through simulations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lv et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: