Engineered wetlands improve water quality by removing pollutants, suggesting efficacy varies with climatic conditions.
Engineered wetland has been used as a Best Management Practice (BMP) to remove pollutants and maintain water quality in watersheds. This study is focused on developing models to analyze the impacts of discharges on the efficiency of wetlands to improve water quality downstream. The watershed hydrological Soil & Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) and wetland (Personal Computer Storm Water Management Model—PCSWMM) models were developed to analyze the efficiency of engineered wetlands to remove the pollutants for different basins under three different climatic conditions (i.e., dry, average and wet year). The SWAT was calibrated and validated to simulate discharge and water quality parameters. The wetland model was developed using inflow hydrographs and concentrations of the water quality parameters biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), total suspended solids (TSSs), total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorous (TP), simulated from a Soil & Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model. A PCSWMM (wetland) was developed based on the physical and first order decay process within the wetland system for three basins in Prairie du Pont watershed in Illinois, USA. The results showed that pollutant removal efficiencies decreased from low to high discharges (dry to wet climatic conditions) for all watersheds and pollutants (except for BOD) based on trendline analysis. Nevertheless, the efficiencies were highly variable, specifically during low discharges. Furthermore, the sensitivity of the k-parameter (areal rate constant) was pollutant dependent. Overall, this study is helpful to understand the efficacy of wetlands’ pollutant removal as a function of discharge. The approach can be used in watersheds located in other geographic regions for the preliminary design of engineered wetlands to remove non-point source pollution and treat stormwater runoff.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shrestha et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: