Numerical analysis reveals baffle structures impact mixing time in diesel storage tanks, suggesting optimization pathways.
Emergency diesel is prone to degradation during long-term storage, and experimental evaluations are costly and slow. Three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were employed to model the diesel conditioning process. A physical model based on the actual dimensions of the storage tank was constructed. The volume of fraction (VOF) model tracked the gas–liquid interface, and the species transport model handled mixture transport. A UDF then recorded inlet and outlet flow rates and velocities in each cycle. The study focused on the effects of different baffle structures and numbers on conditioning efficiency. Results showed that increasing the baffle flow area significantly delays the mixing time but reduces the cycle time. Openings at the bottom of baffles effectively mitigate the accumulation of high-concentration conditioning oil caused by density differences. Increasing the number of baffles decreases the effective volume of the tank and amplifies density differences across the baffles, which shortens the mixing time. However, excessive baffle numbers diminish these benefits. These findings provide essential theoretical guidance for optimizing baffle design in practical diesel tanks, facilitating rapid achievement of emergency diesel quality standards while reducing costs and improving efficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: