Observational analysis reveals a new model for relative permeability based on resistivity in argillaceous sandstone, indicating enhanced characterization of fluid flow properties.
Relative permeability, as a key parameter characterizing multiphase fluid flow behavior in porous media, holds significant importance across various fields, such as reservoir evaluation and engineering geology. However, measuring relative permeability is time-consuming and costly. Considering the analogy between fluid flow and electrical current conduction provides a novel approach for studying multiphase flow characteristics using resistivity data. An integrated oil–water relative permeability and resistivity co-measurement experiment was specifically designed for a complex argillaceous sandstone reservoir in a block, referred to as Block A. Research has shown that as the resistance coefficient increases, the water and oil relative permeability decrease and increase, respectively. As the porosity–permeability comprehensive index increases and the shale content decreases, corresponding to the same resistance coefficient, the water and oil relative permeability show increasing and decreasing trends, respectively. The integration of tortuous capillary tube theory and three-water model concepts, combined with the flow-current similarity principle, has enabled the development of a novel relative permeability–resistivity correlation model that is applicable to complex argillaceous sandstone formations. The application of actual data from the study area shows that the relative errors of the water- and oil-phase relative permeability calculated by the proposed model are both small, at 16% and 8.6%, respectively. The model is validated to better characterize multiphase fluid flow in rocks, offering a new approach for accurately calculating relative permeability based on formation resistivity data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: