Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental analysis shows fuel injection configurations impact flame transfer function in afterburners, indicating potential for combustion stability improvement.
Combustion instability poses a significant challenge in aerospace propulsion systems, particularly in afterburners that employ bluff-body flame stabilizers. The flame transfer function (FTF) is essential for characterizing the dynamic response of flames to perturbations, which is critical for predicting and controlling these instabilities. This study experimentally investigates the effect of varying the number of fuel injection holes (N = 3, 4, 5, 6) on the FTF and flame dynamics in a model afterburner combustor. Using acoustic excitations, the FTF was measured across a range of frequencies, with flame behavior analyzed via high-speed imaging and chemiluminescence techniques. Results reveal that the FTF gain exhibits dual-peak characteristics, initially decreasing and then increasing with higher N values. The frequencies of these gain peaks shift to higher values as N increases, while the time delay between velocity and heat release rate fluctuations decreases, indicating a faster flame response. Flame morphology analysis shows that higher N leads to shorter, taller flames due to enhanced fuel distribution and mixing. Detailed examination of flame dynamics indicates that different pulsation modes dominate at various frequencies, elucidating the observed FTF behavior. This research provides novel insights into the optimization of fuel injection configurations to enhance combustion stability in afterburners, advancing the development of more reliable and efficient aerospace propulsion systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: