August 13, 2025International Journal of Law Environment and Natural ResourcesOpen Access

The Dialectics of Freedom of Expression and Legal Restrictions on Digital Platforms: An Analysis of Human Rights Principles, the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, and Constitutional Court Decision No. 105/PUU-XXII/2024

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

The Court's decision limits defamation offenses under the ITE Law to individuals, emphasizing legal certainty.
Controversy surrounding the ITE Law stems from vague and broad language, resulting in excessive discretionary power.
This research employs a doctrinal legal method focusing on constitutional and human rights principles.
The findings underscore a balance between protecting individual rights and maintaining public interest in democracy.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

Doctrinal analysis reveals Constitutional Court’s decision strengthens freedom of expression and human rights under the electronic information and transactions law.

Cite This Study

Hanafi Ramsi (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af50a7ad7bf08b1ead8ddf https://doi.org/10.51749/injurlens.v5i1.132

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Doctrinal analysis reveals Constitutional Court’s decision strengthens freedom of expression and human rights under the electronic information and transactions law.

The Dialectics of Freedom of Expression and Legal Restrictions on Digital Platforms: An Analysis of Human Rights Principles, the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, and Constitutional Court Decision No. 105/PUU-XXII/2024

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

The Dialectics of Freedom of Expression and Legal Restrictions on Digital Platforms: An Analysis of Human Rights Principles, the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, and Constitutional Court Decision No. 105/PUU-XXII/2024

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider