This analysis compares the strategic approach to populism with the ideational framework, revealing insights into Netanyahu's political tactics and relationships.
This paper examines the phenomenon of populism in Israel through the lens of Kurt Weyland's strategic approach, with a particular focus on the political strategies of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. While most studies of Israeli populism have applied the ideational approach associated with Cas Mudde, this paper breaks new ground by analysing Netanyahu's actions as a strategic effort to maintain power. We compare and contrast the two approaches, demonstrating the greater utility of the strategic approach in comparison to the ideational. By examining Netanyahu's media tactics, rhetorical strategies, and his circumvention of traditional Likud party structures, this paper argues that Netanyahu's shift from defending to attacking elite institutions, such as the Supreme Court and the state prosecution, is a calculated move to bolster his support base. Additionally, the study highlights the clientelist relationships forged by Netanyahu within his party, where loyalty is rewarded with political advancement. This analysis contributes to the broader understanding of populism in Israel and offers insights into the dynamics of political leadership in populist movements, including in the Mediterranean region.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Day et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: