Background: Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) is a standard treatment for neonatal pulmonary hypertension in high-resource settings, yet its efficacy and cost-effectiveness in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remain underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of iNO on neonatal outcomes within a resource-limited Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) setting in Manaus, Brazil, to inform public health strategies. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, quasi-experimental study employing a historical control design. We compared outcomes in 12 prospective neonates receiving iNO for persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) secondary to perinatal asphyxia (March-August 2018) with 12 historical controls (December 2015-December 2016). Participants were at a gestational age of more than 34 weeks with echocardiographic evidence of PPHN. Main outcomes included oxygenation parameters, mortality, and length of hospital stay. Results: The prospective group demonstrated significant acute improvement in all key oxygenation parameters following initiation of iNO (p < 0.01 for PO2, O2 saturation, PO2/FiO2, and Oxygenation Index). However, iNO did not significantly reduce overall mortality (16.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.48) or NICU length of stay (21.3 vs. 13.2 days, p = 0.09). Notably, total hospital length of stay was significantly longer in the iNO group (37.1 vs. 23.08 days, p=0.03), with deaths primarily linked to systemic complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferreira et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: