This analysis reveals enhanced cadmium removal efficiency in constructed wetlands, highlighting the role of microbial community and adsorption mechanisms.
The excessive emission of cadmium (Cd2+) poses a serious threat to the aquatic environment due to its high toxicity and bioaccumulation potential. This study constructed three types of vertical-subsurface-flow constructed wetlands configured with iron–carbon–zeolite composite substrates, including an iron–carbon–zeolite constructed wetland (TF-CW), a zeolite–iron–carbon constructed wetland (FT-CW), and an iron–carbon–zeolite mixed constructed wetland (H-CW), to investigate the purification performance and mechanisms of constructed wetlands for cadmium-containing wastewater (0~6 mg/L). The results demonstrated that iron–carbon–zeolite composite substrates significantly enhanced Cd2+ removal efficiency (>99%) through synergistic redox-adsorption mechanisms, where the iron–carbon substrate layer dominated Fe-Cd co-precipitation, while the zeolite layer achieved short-term cadmium retention through ion-exchange adsorption. FT-CW exhibited superior NH4+-N removal efficiency (77.66%~92.23%) compared with TF-CW (71.45%~88.05%), while iron–carbon micro-electrolysis effectively inhibited NO3−-N accumulation (<0.1 mg/L). Under cadmium stress, Typha primarily accumulated cadmium through its root systems (>85%) and alleviated oxidative damage by dynamically regulating antioxidative enzyme activity, with the superoxide dismutase (SOD) peak occurring at 3 mg/L Cd2+ treatment. Microbial community analysis revealed that iron–carbon substrates promoted the relative abundance of Bacteroidota and Patescibacteria as well as the enrichment of Saccharimonadales, Thauera, and Rhodocyclaceae (genera), enhancing system stability. This study confirms that iron–carbon–zeolite CWs provide an efficient and sustainable technological pathway for heavy metal-contaminated water remediation through multidimensional mechanisms of “chemical immobilization–plant enrichment–microbial metabolism”.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: