Study develops a reliable liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for polychlorinated alkanes, suggesting improvements in food safety testing.
Polychlorinated alkanes (PCAs), the principal constituents of chlorinated-paraffin technical mixtures, are persistent, bioaccumulative pollutants that raise growing toxicological concern. Due to their complexity, PCA analysis in food remains analytically challenging, predominantly relying on high-resolution mass spectrometry applications. This study aimed to develop and validate a more accessible liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) method for quantifying PCA-C 10–17 in food commodities. Six reversed-phase columns were evaluated during the study, and phenyl-hexyl and biphenyl stationary phases provided superior separation of critical isobaric PCA homologues. Ammonium acetate (5 mM) was used as a mobile phase additive to promote the formation of acetate adducts, enhancing selectivity in MS/MS settings by minimizing the impact of deprotonated species on product-ion spectra. Validation experiments conducted using fortified samples demonstrated satisfactory recoveries (PCA-C 10–13 , 88%; PCA-C 14–17 , 121%; and PCA-C 10–17 , 103%). Comparative analyses using six interlaboratory test materials and a certified fish matrix reference material confirmed the method’s accuracy. All z -scores for PCA-C 10–13 were ≤|2|, and only 2 results for PCA-C 14–17 were in the questionable range (| z |= 2–3). In the certified reference material, measured values for PCA-C 10–13 were within the certified range, while those for PCA-C 14–17 were near its lower boundary. The developed method was compared to the conventional high-resolution mass spectrometry, showing a strong agreement between the results of both instrumental setups. These results establish this LC–MS/MS protocol as an accessible and reliable alternative to PCA monitoring within food safety and regulatory frameworks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pērkons et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: