Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis reveals shortcomings in copyright frameworks for artificial intelligence creations, suggesting improvements in governance.
With the progress of artificial intelligence technology, its application in the creative field continues to extend to literature, music and visual arts. This study analyzes the dual problems faced by copyright protection and the legal governance of creative achievements produced by artificial intelligence. The investigation first needs to clarify the basic attributes and outstanding characteristics of artificial intelligence works. It then assesses the effectiveness of existing copyright frameworks in dealing with such works. With the help of a detailed analysis of the author identity and original standards, this paper finds out the key deficiencies of the current legislation, and gives specific suggestions from the three key points of establishing a reasonable limit of use, clarifying tort liability, and implementing protection mechanisms. The conclusion summarizes the potential path to improve the legal system. Educational initiatives to enhance social awareness of AI-generated content governance are also proposed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
T. Hu (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: