This essay highlights emotional factors impacting marine conservation efforts, suggesting their integration may enhance policy and research outcomes.
This essay examines emotions as a critical, yet underutilized, dimension in marine conservation and ocean sustainability science. Drawing on cognitive neuroscience, social psychology, human geography, and political ecology, we argue that integrating emotional dimensions into research, policy, and practice can enhance both understanding and action toward marine conservation and ocean sustainability. We conceptualize emotions, and explore their experiential and functional implications in marine contexts. Using targeted case examples and theories, we identify both opportunities and challenges for applying emotional insights in research, policy, and practice, including barriers posed by dominant rationality models of human decision-making. We present intellectual pathways as well as research, methodological and policy agendas to integrate emotions into marine conservation research and strategies. Our analysis responds to gaps in the literature and provides actionable recommendations for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners during the UN Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrews et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: