Philosophical inquiry reveals a new understanding of well-being based on Confucian joy and emotions.
A survey of the existing literature shows that there is limited philosophical inquiry into the construct of well-being, particularly from East Asian spiritual traditions. This article reconceptualises well-being by critiquing the prevailing constructs of well-being, and proposing an alternative formulation from Confucian philosophy. I argue that the dominant categorisation of well-being into hedonic and eudaimonic has engendered two major weaknesses. First, the emphasis on positive emotions in hedonic well-being privileges individualism and self-interest, catalysed by the positive psychology movement. Secondly, there is a lack of clarity on the role of emotions and the place of virtues in self-actualisation for eudaimonic well-being. I then sketch a Confucian interpretation of well-being by drawing on Mencius’ spiritual ideal of joy. My argument is that Mencian well-being revolves around virtue-directed joy, which is experienced through the extension of innate moral feelings. Instead of an artificial dichotomy of well-being into hedonic and eudaimonic well-being, Mencius harmonises both by acknowledging both positive emotions and self-actualisation. Confucian spiritual perspectives extend the existing scholarship by providing an original interpretation of well-being that foregrounds the primary role of emotions in character development. Confucian spiritual perspectives extend the existing scholarship on well-being by foregrounding collective well-being, and highlighting the contribution of emotional experience to the cultivation of ethical character.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Charlene Tan (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: