Observational analysis reduces spatial population synchrony by increasing beta-diversity in fish, indicating a need for ecosystem management.
Animal populations often display coherent temporal fluctuations in their abundance, with far-ranging implications for species persistence and ecosystem stability. The key mechanisms driving spatial population synchrony include organismal dispersal, spatially correlated environmental dynamics (Moran effect) and concordant consumer-resource dynamics. Disentangling these mechanisms, however, is notoriously difficult in natural systems and the extent to which the biotic environment (intensity and types of biotic interactions) mediates metapopulation dynamics remains a largely unanswered question. Here we test the hypothesis that compositional differences among communities (i.e, beta-diversity), used as a proxy of the differences in biotic interactions experienced by separated populations, reduces population synchrony. Using an extensive dataset of fish population abundance time-series across Europe, we provide evidence that higher beta-diversity is associated with reduced spatial population synchrony within river networks, and demonstrate that these effects are independent from geographic separation, environmental dissimilarity and Moran effects. Although beta-diversity is commonly shown to promote metacommunity stability by reducing spatial synchrony in aggregate community attributes (e.g. total biomass), our study indicate that compositional heterogeneity provides a previously overlooked spatial insurance effect that influences metapopulation dynamics by promoting asynchrony between populations separated in space. These findings illustrate how community assembly across different locations within river networks contributes to metapopulation stability and persistence of individual species, and further highlights the implications of the loss in beta-diversity over time via biotic homogenisation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Larsen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: