Mini-review highlights ultrasound as a radiation-free alternative for assessing bone age in children and adolescents, suggesting improvements in clinical decision-making.
Bone age assessment is a critical tool for evaluating skeletal maturity in children and adolescents, with implications for growth monitoring and clinical decision-making. While traditional radiographic methods such as the Greulich-Pyle and Tanner-Whitehouse systems remain the gold standard, concerns over ionizing radiation exposure have spurred interest in ultrasound-based alternatives. This mini-review synthesizes current evidence on ultrasound bone age assessment, highlighting its advantages as a radiation-free, non-invasive modality with strong correlations to radiographic standards. Key advancements include standardized scoring systems, ossification ratios (e.g., radius/ulna/femur), and acoustic measures (e.g., speed of sound), which enhance reliability and reduce inter-operator variability. However, challenges persist, including protocol standardization, population-specific variability, and operator dependency, particularly in advanced pubertal stages. Future directions emphasize the development of large-scale, longitudinal and multi-ethnic reference databases, consensus guidelines, and AI integration to improve precision. Ultrasound bone age assessment shows promise as a viable clinical tool, but further refinements are needed to address its limitations and ensure equitable applicability across diverse populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: