Evaluation reveals high completion rates and participant diversity in Yahoo! Crowdsourcing, highlighting its potential for data quality.
Introduction Conducting research online has become common in human participant research and notably in the field of human-computer interaction (HCI). Many researchers have used English-language and Western participant pool and recruitment platforms like Amazon Mechanical Turk and Prolific, with panel quality and representativeness known to vary greatly. Less is known about non-English, non-Western options. We consider Japan, a nation that produces a significant portion of HCI research. We report on an evaluation of the widely-used Yahoo! Crowdsourcing (YCS) recruitment platform. Methods We evaluated 65 data sets comprising N = 60, 681 participants, primarily focusing on the 42 data sets with complete meta data from studies requiring earnest participation ( n = 29, 081). Results We found generally high completion (77.6%) and retention rates (70.1%). Notably, use of multimedia stimuli exhibited higher completion (97.7%) and retention (91.9%) rates. We also found that the “general” participant setting attracted middle-aged men. Discussion We offer guidelines for best practice, such as online questionnaire design strategies to increase data quality and filtering to capture a more representative audience. We reveal the nature, power, and limitations of YCS for HCI and other fields conducting human participant research online.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seaborn et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: