Case report details chemical ocular trauma from stamper ink mistaken for artificial tears, suggesting prevention strategies.
Background: The incidence of chemical ocular trauma after accidentally instilling the “wrong” eyedrops is still frequent, but cases resulting from stamper ink refills are rare. Case Presentation: A 73-year-old man presented to our emergency department with a history of inadvertently instilling stamper ink refill into both eyes (BEs) instead of artificial tears. Immediate irrigation and evaluation were performed. The initial visual acuity (VA) was 0.4 in the right eye (RE) and 0.8 in the left eye (LE). Slit lamp examination showed edema palpebra with periocular blue staining in BEs, chemotic conjunctiva with a much darker color in the RE than the LE, and epithelial defects with a positive fluorescein test in BEs. A diagnosis of bilateral corneal abrasion and chemotic conjunctiva was established. Ten hours after the emergency visit, RE VA decreased to 0.2, and corneal edema was found during the follow-up examination. Medications including levofloxacin antibiotic, sodium hyaluronate, sodium chloride, combined polymyxin sulfate–neomycin sulfate and dexamethasone eyedrops, mefenamic acid, and ascorbic acid tablets were prescribed. The RE corneal edema still occurred, and the endothelial cell count was 1952 and 987 cells/mm2 in the RE and LE at the one-week follow-up. After three weeks, corneal edema had fully resolved, and the VA was 0.4 and 0.8 in the RE and LE, respectively. Conclusions: This case report adds to the spectrum of the continuing problem of chemical ocular trauma after mistakenly instilling the eyedrops. Promoting and changing to different packages for non-ophthalmic products in plastic bottles mimicking eyedroppers is essential to minimize these injuries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ardiani et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: