Research demonstrates improved tourist guidance efficiency and exhibition planning in architectural heritage, highlighting a value-chain approach.
As a national treasure, architectural heritage carries multiple value dimensions such as history, technology, art, and culture. With the increasing demand for architectural heritage protection and utilization, the traditional static digital model of architectural heritage based on geometric expression can no longer meet the practical application of multi-stage and multi-level scenarios. To this end, this paper proposes a value-chain-driven multi-level digital twin model of architectural heritage. Based on the three-stage logic of protection, management, and dissemination of value-chain classification, it integrates four types of models: geometry, physics, rules, and behavior. Combined with different hierarchical application levels, the digital model of architectural heritage is refined into a VCLOD (Value-Chain-Driven Level of Detail) detail hierarchy system to achieve a unified expression from spatial form restoration to intelligent response. Through the empirical application of three typical scenarios: the full-area guided tour of the Forbidden City, the exhibition curation of the central axis and the preventive protection of the Meridian Gate, the model shows the following specific results: (1) the efficiency of tourist guidance is improved through real-time personalized path planning; (2) the exhibition planning and visitor experience are improved through dynamic monitoring and interactive management of the exhibition environment; (3) the predictive analysis and preventive protection measures of structural safety are realized, effectively ensuring the structural safety of the Meridian Gate. The research results provide a theoretical basis and practical support for the systematic expression and intelligent evolution of digital twins of architectural heritage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: