Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 20, 2025Deleted Journal

Does Implementing Mendez Principles on Effective Interviewing for Investigations and Information Gathering Serve Victims of Crime?

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

PCProf. Dobrinka Chankova

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Analysis reveals Mendez Principles improve investigative practices for victims in criminal justice, suggesting enhanced fairness.

Key Points

  • Implementing the Mendez Principles improves support for victims of crime, promoting fair and just practices.
  • Key evidence indicates the Principles help to eliminate coercive methods in criminal investigations, enhancing human rights.
  • This study employs an observational analysis of practices aligned with the Mendez Principles and their implications for victims.
  • The findings may highlight the need for broader adoption of ethical interviewing methods in law enforcement practices.

Cite This Study

Prof. Dobrinka Chankova (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af53ffad7bf08b1eada9b5https://doi.org/10.35609/gcbssproceeding.2025.1(8)
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Research on Improving the Interviewing of Suspects2025
  2. 2Implementing the Méndez Principles in a Confession‐Oriented Culture: A Pilot Study of Investigative Interview Training in a Brazilian Police Academy2026
  3. 3Right to complain about mistreatment in criminal interviews and interrogations following international and EU law and the Méndez Principles2024
  4. 4Cross-Cultural Similarities and Differences in the Interrogation of Suspects2026
  5. 5The Changing Landscape of Police Interviewing and Interrogation2025 · 4 citations