Can a Divine Command Theory Vindicate the Objectivity of Morality?

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

Discussion

This analysis critiques divine command theories on moral objectivity, suggesting their critics fail to undermine its strengths.

Divine command theories provide a defense for objectivity in moral judgments, despite criticism of being subjective.
Key critique examples include appraiser independence, stance independence, and observer independence, none effectively undermining DCM.
Critiques of divine command metaethics often rely on misunderstandings of moral thought's objectivist features instead of substantive arguments.
The paper underscores that divine command theory remains a viable framework for understanding the objectivity of morality.

Matthew Flannagan (2025) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

This analysis critiques divine command theories on moral objectivity, suggesting their critics fail to undermine its strengths.

Divine command theories provide a defense for objectivity in moral judgments, despite criticism of being subjective.
Key critique examples include appraiser independence, stance independence, and observer independence, none effectively undermining DCM.
Critiques of divine command metaethics often rely on misunderstandings of moral thought's objectivist features instead of substantive arguments.
The paper underscores that divine command theory remains a viable framework for understanding the objectivity of morality.

Matthew Flannagan (2025) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark