This analysis investigates contradictions in deduction from self-referential premises, suggesting implications for understanding paradoxes.
The article examines a number of contradictions that are considered the basis for obtaining a number of assumptions. This ambatory that turn out to be mandatory for the emergence of paradoxes. Paradoxes, in turn, depend on the possibility of their deduction from self-referential premises. This issue is being considered. Obtaining contradictions from self-referential premises based on deduction from explicit self-referential premises is as a main topic of this article.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Valeriy A. Surovtsev (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: