Toward global scientific literacy: Evaluating primary science education in Indonesia’s Merdeka and Cambridge curricula

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

Discussion

Qualitative analysis compares scientific literacy approaches in Merdeka and Cambridge Curricula, indicating differing strengths.

Findings show that the Merdeka Curriculum enhances holistic development through project-based learning, while the Cambridge Curriculum emphasizes inquiry-based learning.
Key components analyzed include learning objectives, content, instruction, and assessment under both curricula, leading to significant insights.
The study used qualitative methods, including document analysis and classroom observations, to gather comprehensive data on each curriculum's implementation.
Recommendations highlight the need for a hybrid model that combines global standards and local values to improve science education for diverse contexts.

Wijaya et al. (2025) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark