Analysis reveals distinct afterslip and viscoelastic relaxation effects in Alaska, suggesting regional rheology variability.
Summary The widespread, multi-year crustal deformation induced by megathrust earthquakes (Mw8+) is primarily controlled by the combined effects of continuous aseismic slip on the fault plane (afterslip) and viscoelastic relaxation driven by coseismic stress perturbations in the upper mantle. However, till today it remains a considerable challenge to separate these two mechanisms in geodetic observations. We derived the first 3-year GNSS observations following the 2021 Chignik Mw8.2 earthquake to investigate the mechanisms of postseismic deformation. We established a model capable of simultaneously simulating afterslip and viscoelastic relaxation, and constrained the upper mantle rheology beneath the Alaska Peninsula. The best-fit model effectively reproduces the GNSS observations and reveals a notable viscosity difference between the mantle wedge and the oceanic asthenosphere, with steady-state viscosities of 3 × 10¹⁸ Pa s and 4 × 10¹⁹ Pa s, respectively. The inferred mantle wedge viscosity beneath the Alaska Peninsula is lower than the values reported for south-central and southeastern Alaska, suggesting an eastward increase in viscosity along the subduction zone. Two main patches of afterslip are identified during the first 3 years. The patch of up-dip afterslip overlaps with the 1938 Chignik Mw8.3 earthquake rupture zone, and demonstrates a close spatial correlation with the slow slip event in 2018. The above new results enhance our insights into the spatial variability of regional rheology and slip behavior along the Alaska-Aleutian subduction zone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: