Phase 3 trial validates non-SARS-CoV-2 infections as a negative control, indicating potential bias in vaccine efficacy estimates.
Negative control outcomes (NCOs) are useful tools for hidden bias detection, but empirical evidence validating NCOs for COVID-19 is lacking. To address this gap, we examined the blinded phase of the randomized, placebo-controlled Coronavirus Vaccine Efficacy (COVE; NCT04470427) trial of the mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine. We confirmed that acute respiratory illness with a positive test for a non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory pathogen on a multiplex PCR panel was a valid NCO for COVID-19, considering that it was unaffected by vaccination (vaccine efficacy, VE=3.3% (95% CI, -22.3–23.6)) yet strongly associated with COVID-19 (odds ratio=2.95 (95% CI, 2.00–4.24)). Subsequently, we leveraged non-SARS-CoV-2 infections to detect bias in time-varying VE estimates from COVE’s blinded and booster phases. Balanced incidence of non-SARS-CoV-2 infection between vaccinated and unvaccinated COVID-19-free risk sets suggested low selection bias in VE estimates of two-dose mRNA-1273 against COVID-19 during the blinded phase (VE=92.5% (95% CI, 88.8–94.9) 14 days post-dose-two, stable for 5 months). In COVE’s booster phase, higher non-SARS-CoV-2 incidence was observed after the single booster (intensity ratio, IR=2.38 (95% CI, 1.75–3.25) 14 days post-boost), suggesting that booster VE estimates may underestimate the true VE against COVID-19. Our findings demonstrate the potential of off-target infections for unraveling complex biases in COVID-19 vaccine studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ashby et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: