Phase 2 study evaluated CLEFT-Q for patient satisfaction in 93 cleft lip/palate patients, highlighting important outcomes.
This study evaluated the cross-cultural validity of the CLEFT-Q and measured patient satisfaction with surgical outcomes among patients with cleft lip and/or palate. Conducted as a Phase 2 study at a tertiary referral hospital in Thailand, the research involved 93 patients aged 8 to 29 years who had undergone cleft lip and/or cleft palate surgery. Participants completed the CLEFT-Q, a patient-reported outcome measure, to assess their satisfaction with appearance, health-related quality of life, and facial function. The comprehensibility of the CLEFT-Q was also evaluated. Rasch-transformed scores were analyzed, with statistical significance set at P ≤0.05. Results showed moderate satisfaction with appearance (mean=53.8), with the highest scores for jaw appearance and the lowest for nostrils, teeth, and cleft scars. In contrast, satisfaction with facial function was higher (mean=70.9), and psychosocial and speech-related outcomes were favorable. The CLEFT-Q demonstrated high comprehensibility across all domains. The study concludes that the CLEFT-Q is a valid tool for assessing patient-reported outcomes in Thailand. While functional outcomes are generally positive, aesthetic satisfaction—particularly regarding nasal and dental appearance—requires further improvement. These findings highlight the importance of a greater emphasis on aesthetic outcomes in cleft care to more effectively meet patient expectations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wasinsangworn et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: