Experimental analysis revealed significant improvements in shear bond strength of zirconia using various cleaning protocols and air abrasion.
This study aimed to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of zirconia to dual-cured resin cement following various cleaning protocols and surface treatments after cement contamination. Seventy-seven zirconia specimens (5 × 5 × 2.5 mm3) were fabricated, polished, and randomly divided into seven groups (n = 11). Ten specimens per group were tested for SBS, and one was reserved for scanning electron microscopy. Group C− was cemented without surface treatment, while group C+ received air abrasion prior to cementation. Groups F − , F + , FT + , S − , and S+ were initially air-abraded and then contaminated with resin cement. F-series groups were cleaned using a furnace, and S-series with a piezoelectric scaler. Among these, F + , FT + , and S+ received additional air abrasion prior to re-cementation, whereas F− and S− did not. Groups F+ and S+ were re-cemented immediately, whereas FT+ was re-cemented 7 days after surface re-treatment. All specimens were artificially aged before SBS testing. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's HSD post-hoc test was used for statistical analysis (α = 0.05). Statistically significant differences in SBS were found among the groups (p < 0.05). Group F+ demonstrated the highest bond strength (6.60 ± 1.10 MPa), followed by groups C+ (6.59 ± 0.94 MPa) and S+ (5.42 ± 0.87 MPa), with no significant differences among these three. The lowest SBS was observed in group C− (2.66 ± 0.51 MPa). Intermediate values were recorded in groups F− (4.17 ± 0.95 MPa), FT+ (4.41 ± 0.95 MPa), and S− (4.60 ± 1.17 MPa), which did not differ significantly from each other. Cleaning cement-contaminated zirconia using a furnace or piezoelectric scaler, followed by air abrasion and immediate re-cementation, significantly improves SBS to levels comparable with clean, air-abraded zirconia. Air abrasion enhances bonding efficacy, while delayed re-cementation may diminish bond strength even after surface re-treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suwannachot et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: