Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
June 30, 2025Scientific and Analytical Herald of IE RASOpen Access

National and Supranational Components in the European Union Strategy in the Indo-Pacific Region

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

OTOlga TimakovaDiplomatic Academy of the Russian Foreign Ministry

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Analysis reveals contradictions in EU strategy in the Indo-Pacific region, highlighting national interests of member states.

Key Points

  • EU strategy faces significant internal disagreements, limiting its effectiveness in the Indo-Pacific region.
  • The analysis includes a comparison of national foreign policy priorities among member states like France and Germany.
  • Assessment of strategic documents shows the EU's actions are often incoherent in addressing regional challenges.
  • Despite ambitions for strategic autonomy, the EU remains secondary in the Indo-Pacific compared to powers like the US and China.

Cite This Study

Olga Timakova (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af540fad7bf08b1eadb27chttps://doi.org/10.15211/vestnikieran320251627
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The European Union in the Indo‐Pacific: Gauging the EU's Indo‐Pacific Strategy Across Eight Indo‐Pacific Locations2026
  2. 2THE MARITIME WHOLE OF GOVERNMENT APPROACH AND THE INDO-PACIFIC’S MAJOR PLAYERS GEOPOLITICS2025 · 1 citations
  3. 3Why, how and to whom is the European Union signalling in the Indo-Pacific? Understanding the European Union’s strategy in the Indo-Pacific in the epicentre of multipolar competition2024 · 13 citations
  4. 4Navigating the Indo‐Pacific: The EU 's 2025 Council Conclusions Amidst Geopolitical Uncertainty2026
  5. 5Added Value or Strategic Irritant? Chinese Elite Perceptions of the EU's Indo‐Pacific Strategy2026